Some scholars regard it as a fictitious vision – the Temple as Ezekiel wished it to be
some see it an eye-witness description from the time of Zerubbabel
it is also possible that Ezekiel described the Temple as it was near the time of its destruction in 587 BC, after many alterations and improvements had been made in the hundreds of years since Solomon’s reign.
Where was Solomon’s Temple?
An outline map of the small fortress of Jebus (Jerusalem) with the large rock platform to its? north. It was on this platform that the Temple was built.
Photograph of the present-day site of the Dome of the Rock
The site of the Temple was on that part of the eastern hill of Jerusalem now occupied by the large platform (35 acres) known as the Haram-es-Sharif.
A large number of scholars place the Temple close to the sacred rock (see below) which is enclosed in the Dome of the Rock.
The sacred rock enclosed within the Dome of the Rock. This is said to be the actual site of Solomon’s Temple.
Theory 1: The rock (above) may have been the site of the altar of burnt offerings identified by I Chronicles 22:1 as the threshing floor of Ornan. This would locate the Temple west of this rock.
The problem with this view is that the hill slopes away steeply from the rock, requiring the elevated Holy of Holies to be supported by an enormous substratum.
Theory 2: Another?theory (confirmed to some extent by a rabbinical tradition that the surface of the rock broke through to the debir) places the great altar over the rock.
The rock was called ‘eben shtiyah’ (foundation stone) and was considered the foundation stone of Heaven and earth.
Who built Solomon’s Temple?
According to the Bible, the construction of Solomon’s Temple took seven years, from the 5th to the 11th years of his reign (I Kings 6:37-38).
He was assisted in his work by Phoenician craftsmen lent for the purpose by Hiram, King of Tyre, who also supplied him, by contract, with timber from Lebanon.
The Israelites were conscripted to provide the bulk of the labour force but the skilled workmen were Phoenicians (II Chronicles 2:7-14).
Some of the materials, including the gold ingots which were to be used for the sacred objects, had been prepared by David (I Chronicles 22).
The design of Solomon’s Temple
As far as we can tell, the Temple was an oblong structure consisting of three parts:
the ulam (vestibule) marked in the diagram below as A,
the hekhal (main sanctuary for worship), later called the Holy Place, B,
and the debir, C, (the Holy of Holies) reserved for Yahweh and containing the Ark.
These sections stood one behind the other in a straight line. The whole Temple was laid out with an east west orientation, the ulam or outer hall facing east.
The Temple was constructed of
hewn stone (at the base) and
cedarwood, which locked the beams together and stood on the stone base.
Cutaway model of the ulam (vestibule), the hekhal, and the debir
The four sections of the Temple
The Ulam – a vestibule
This was the outer hall, which served as a vestibule, and was designed as a barrier between the secular and the sacred portions of the sanctuary. It was about 10 cubits long and 20 cubits wide (the cubit is approximately 0.45m. or 1.5ft.).
The entrance door was in its broad side, and was 14 cubits wide. The entrance faced the rising sun, and was flanked by the two free-standing pillars, Jachin and Boaz.
The Hekhal – the sanctuary
The word hekhal? is derived from a Mesopotamian term, ekallu, a temple or sanctuary.
From the ulam, a cypress door 10 cubits wide led into the hekhal. Both ulam and hekhal are treated as one whole (I Kings 6:2). Properly speaking, they formed the ‘house’ or Temple.
The hekhal was by far the largest room in the Temple, and was 40 cubits long, 20 cubits wide and 30 cubits high. It was dimly lit by latticed windows, and had wide openings which narrowed towards the interior.
The Debir or Holy of Holies
Gold figures resembling cherubim, found in the Tomb of Tutankhamun
The third and inner section was the Holy of Holies. The room, measuring 20 cubits in each dimension, was designed to hold the Ark of the Covenant and the Cherubim.
According to Isaiah 6:1 its floor level was higher than the rest of the Temple and it was windowless.
A flight of stairs led to the Debir from the hekhal, and it was entered through a door 6 cubits wide. Some scholars believe that it was separated from the hekhal by a thin wall (Ezekiel 41:3) or by a veil.
The Yatzia (Side-Building)
The ‘yatzia’ was an exterior building buttressing the sanctuary, and surrounding the Temple on three sides (except the ulam and the facade).
It had three very low storeys, each storey a cubit wider than the one below. Thus the bottom one was 5 cubits wide, the second 6 cubits, and the third seven cubits. The total height of the yatzia was only 15 cubits, so it was lower than the central building.
Every floor had about 30?vaults, in which were kept all the vessels and instruments employed in the sacrificial rites and other objects which were not in regular use, as well as the gifts to the Temple.?See the diagram above.
Dimensions of the Temple buildings
The total length of the Temple has been reckoned as 100 cubits, and its width as 50 cubits. The proportion between length and width was 2:1, a common measurement in temples of the ancient Near East.
There was also a set proportion between the doors, which became narrower as one penetrated inward: the outer door was 14 cubits wide, the middle door 10 cubits, and the inside door 6 cubits.
The?smaller one was of cedarwood and was decorated with gold leaf; it stood in the hechal before the entrance to the Debir and was used for offering incense.
The larger altar, made of bronze, was for burnt offerings. It stood in front of the Temple in the inner courtyard, surrounded by a ditch. It was 10 cubits high and was built in the form of stages, superimposed one on top of the other, with an incline leading from one stage to the next.
Megiddo, photograph courtesy of Jerry Hawkes
The foundation or lowest stage was named ‘Bosom of the Earth’ and the uppermost ‘Har’el’, meaning ‘mountain of God’, a remnant of cosmic symbolism, possibly influenced by foreign concepts which regarded the temple as the microcosm of the world – hence the extraordinary importance of the altar in later religions.
The reconstructed horned altar found at the northern city of Dan
At the four corners of Har’el were affixed four horns, the use of which is not quite clear.
Similar horns were discovered in large numbers on top of limestone incense altars at Megiddo, Gezer and other places – see the one found in the northern city of Dan, at right.
The “Sea of Bronze”
In the courtyard south east of the Temple stood a large bronze bowl ‘wrought like the brim of a cup, like the flower of a lily’. It was held up by four groups of sculptured bulls, three bulls in each group.
According to I Kings, its capacity was 2000 ‘bat’, while II Chronicles puts it at 3000 bat (scholars suggest a bat was 22 litres, or 5 gallons).
The best parallels which have been found are the?basins excavated?in Megiddo, and in Amathonte in Cyprus – see the picture above.
The Bible also mentions ten wheeled pedestals, each supporting a bronze laver used to wash the sacrificial victims. Such pedestals have also been found in Cyprus and Megiddo.
Jachin and Boaz
In front of the Temple, before the vestibule, were two bronze columns called Jachin and Boaz.
The Bible describes them thus:
1 Kings 7:15-22? ?(Huram, a skilled bronze-worker) cast two bronze pillars, each eighteen cubits high and twelve cubits in circumference. 16 He also made two capitals of cast bronze to set on the tops of the pillars; each capital was five cubits high. 17 A network of interwoven chains adorned the capitals on top of the pillars, seven for each capital. 18 He made pomegranates in two rows encircling each network to decorate the capitals on top of the pillars. He did the same for each capital. 19 The capitals on top of the pillars in the portico were in the shape of lilies, four cubits high. 20 On the capitals of both pillars, above the bowl-shaped part next to the network, were the two hundred pomegranates in rows all around. 21 He erected the pillars at the portico of the temple. The pillar to the south he named Jakin and the one to the north Boaz. 22 The capitals on top were in the shape of lilies. And so the work on the pillars was completed.
Thus the pillars were
free standing,?with no obvious?functional purpose, and
elaborately decorated and crowned by ornate bronze capitals, somewhat similar to the capital of the columns from the front of a temple in Medinet Habu, Egypt (see above).
Scholars suggest the columns at the front of Solomon’s Temple were traditional ‘mazebot’ – sacred pillars?which always had a place in the? Canaanite sanctuaries.
The name of the columns remains a riddle.
Who designed Solomon’s Temple?
How and where the plan of the Temple originated is not known for certain, but it probably came from Phoenicia, the home of the Temple’s artisans and builders.
The tripartite division into ulam, hechal and debir was very common among the Canaanites in the pre-Israelite period.
Several recently discovered sanctuaries follow the plan of the rooms standing one behind the other in a line (see image below).
A Prototype in Hazor
Another temple, somewhat better preserved than the others, has been uncovered at Hazor.
This temple (below) also contained three rooms, each leading into another, and its general plan was almost identical with that of Solomon’s Temple. It dates from the Late Bronze Age (13th century BC), thus preceding the Jerusalem temple.
This may well have been the prototype of the Temple of Solomon.
The Temple at Hazor. The outline of three rooms of descending sizes is clearly visible.
Seat of the Divine Presence
Solomon’s Temple, like other temples in the ancient Near East, was intended for ritual purposes. Only those who belonged to the priestly order were allowed-within its precincts. The lay worshipper could not enter the Temple.
In this respect, it was quite different from the synagogues and Christian churches which replaced it.
Though the Temple was erected primarily as a royal chapel adjoining the king’s palace (a common practice in the Near East), it had national significance throughout its history, even though during the Divided Monarchy rival shrines existed in Bethel and Dan.
On several occasions the vessels and equipment of the Temple were stolen by conquerors or surrendered as tribute. Only after the fall of the Northern Kingdom and the reforms of Hezekiah and Josiah did the Temple assume paramount importance as the religious and symbolic focus of the nation.